OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 2 released

[S***@t-online.de]

Hi,

Does anyone feel like giving this OpenSSL beta version (see below)
a try, so we might have the chance to submit possibly needed fixes
before the release and get a working release?
Unfortunately, I really have no time at all to test it myself currently
- at
the current speed, they'll probably release the final version before I
even get to test Beta1 (which I've been planning to do since a few
weeks - but now the already relase beta 2 with a speed that slightly
shocked me ...).

Regards,
Stefan

----------------------

OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 2
============================
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now

released.

The beta release is available for download via HTTP and FTP from the
following master locations (the various FTP mirrors you can find

under

o http://www.openssl.org/source/
o ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/

[p***@smedley.id.au]

I'll try and take a look tonight.....

Post by S***@t-online.de
Hi,
Does anyone feel like giving this OpenSSL beta version (see below)
a try, so we might have the chance to submit possibly needed fixes
before the release and get a working release?
Unfortunately, I really have no time at all to test it myself currently
- at
the current speed, they'll probably release the final version before I
even get to test Beta1 (which I've been planning to do since a few
weeks - but now the already relase beta 2 with a speed that slightly
shocked me ...).
Regards,
Stefan
----------------------

OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 2
============================
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now

released.

The beta release is available for download via HTTP and FTP from the
following master locations (the various FTP mirrors you can find

under

o http://www.openssl.org/source/
o ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/

---------------------------------------------------------------------

...

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

[Paul Smedley]

Hi All,

Post by p***@smedley.id.au
I'll try and take a look tonight.....

Post by S***@t-online.de
Hi,
Does anyone feel like giving this OpenSSL beta version (see below)
a try, so we might have the chance to submit possibly needed fixes
before the release and get a working release?
Unfortunately, I really have no time at all to test it myself currently
- at
the current speed, they'll probably release the final version before I
even get to test Beta1 (which I've been planning to do since a few
weeks - but now the already relase beta 2 with a speed that slightly
shocked me ...).

...

http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=124041313400664&w=2

[S***@t-online.de]

Hi,

Post by Paul Smedley
http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=124041313400664&w=2

First, thanks a lot for submitting the patch...

I didn't look at it (yet), but maybe using BEGINLIBPATH variable
instead of LIBPATH would be an idea to solve the remaining
problem?
Regards,
Stefan

[Dave Yeo]

Post by S***@t-online.de
Hi,
Does anyone feel like giving this OpenSSL beta version (see below)
a try, so we might have the chance to submit possibly needed fixes
before the release and get a working release?
Unfortunately, I really have no time at all to test it myself currently
- at
the current speed, they'll probably release the final version before I
even get to test Beta1 (which I've been planning to do since a few
weeks - but now the already relase beta 2 with a speed that slightly
shocked me ...).

Attempting to build with EMX, gcc 2.8.1 I get this

tmp_dll\sha1dgst.obj(sha1dgst.obj) : error L2029:
'sha1_block_data_order' : unresolved external
tmp_dll\md5_dgst.obj(md5_dgst.obj) : error L2029:
'md5_block_asm_data_order' : unresolved external
tmp_dll\bn_mul.obj(bn_mul.obj) : error L2029: 'bn_sub_part_words' :
unresolved
external

Similar missing symbols with a static build.

All three symbols are defined in asm code which doesn't seem to get
compiled. Actually it looks like the asm code was just dynamically
created. Yes they are created when running os2\os2-emx.cmd.
So we have
crypto/sha/asm/s1-os2.asm
crypto/md5/asm/m5-os2.asm
crypto/bn/asm/bn-os2.asm

which don't seem to be assembled. Unluckily I really don't understand
the build system here :)
Dave